arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper we study relationships between the \emph{matching number}, written $μ(G)$, and the \emph{independence number}, written $α(G)$. Our first main result is to show \[ α(G) \le μ(G) + |X| - μ(G[N_G[X]]), \] where $X$ is \emph{any} intersection of maximum independent sets in $G$. Our second main result is to show \[ δ(G)α(G) \le Δ(G)μ(G), \] where $δ(G)$ and $Δ(G)$ denote the minimum and maximum vertex degrees of $G$, respectively. These results improve on and generalize known relations between $μ(G)$ and $α(G)$. Further, we also give examples showing these improvements.

In Ramsey theory for graphs we are given a graph $G$ and we are required to find the least $n_0$ such that, for any $n\geq n_0$, any red/blue colouring of the edges of $K_n$ gives a subgraph $G$ all of whose edges are blue or all are red. Here we shall be requiring that, for any red/blue colouring of the edges of $K_n$, there must be a copy of $G$ such that its edges are partitioned equally as red or blue (or the sizes of the colour classes differs by one in the case when $G$ has an odd number of edges). This introduces the notion of balanceable graphs and the balance number of $G$ which, if it exists, is the minimum integer bal$(n, G)$ such that, for any red/blue colouring of $E(K_n)$ with more than bal$(n, G)$ edges of either colour, $K_n$ will contain a balanced coloured copy of $G$ as described above. This parameter was introduced by Caro, Hansberg and Montejano in \cite{2018arXivCHM}. There, the authors also introduce the strong balance number sbal$(n,G)$ and the more general omnitonal number ot$(n, G)$ which requires copies of $G$ containing a complete distribution of the number of red and blue edges over $E(G)$. In this paper we shall catalogue bal$(n, G)$, sbal$(n, G)$ and ot$(n,G)$ for all graphs $G$ on at most four edges. We shall be using some of the key results of Caro et al, which we here reproduce in full, as well as some new results which we prove here. For example, we shall prove that the union of two bipartite graphs with the same number of edges is always balanceable.

Erdős [On Schütte problem, Math. Gaz. 47 (1963)] proved that every tournament on $n$ vertices has a directed dominating set of at most $\log (n+1)$ vertices, where $\log$ is the logarithm to base $2$. He also showed that there is a tournament on $n$ vertices with no directed domination set of cardinality less than $\log n - 2 \log \log n + 1$. This notion of directed domination number has been generalized to arbitrary graphs by Caro and Henning in [Directed domination in oriented graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. (2012) 160:7--8.]. However, the generalization to directed r-uniform hypergraphs seems to be rare. Among several results, we prove the following upper and lower bounds on $\overrightarrowΓ_{r-1}(H(n,r))$, the upper directed $(r-1)$-domination number of the complete $r$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices $H(n,r)$, which is the main theorem of this paper: \[c (\ln n)^{\frac{1}{r-1}} \le \overrightarrowΓ_{r-1}(H(n,r)) \le C \ln n,\] where $r$ is a positive integer and $c= c(r) > 0$ and $C = C(r) > 0$ are constants depending on $r$.

We say that a subgraph $F$ of a graph $G$ is singular if the degrees $d_G(v)$ are all equal or all distinct for the vertices $v\in V(F)$. The singular Ramsey number Rs$(F)$ is the smallest positive integer $n$ such that, for every $m\geq n$, in every edge 2-coloring of $K_m$, at least one of the color classes contains $F$ as a singular subgraph. In a similar flavor, the singular Turán number Ts$(n,F)$ is defined as the maximum number of edges in a graph of order $n$, which does not contain $F$ as a singular subgraph. In this paper we initiate the study of these extremal problems. We develop methods to estimate Rs$(F)$ and Ts$(n,F)$, present tight asymptotic bounds and exact results.

Erdős, Fajtlowicz and Staton asked for the least integer $f(k)$ such that every graph with more than $f(k)$ vertices has an induced regular subgraph with at least $k$ vertices. Here we consider the following relaxed notions. Let $g(k)$ be the least integer such that every graph with more than $g(k)$ vertices has an induced subgraph with at least $k$ repeated degrees and let $h(k)$ be the least integer such that every graph with more than $h(k)$ vertices has an induced subgraph with at least $k$ maximum degree vertices. We obtain polynomial lower bounds for $h(k)$ and $g(k)$ and nontrivial linear upper bounds when the host graph has bounded maximum degree.

We consider unavoidable chromatic patterns in $2$-colorings of the edges of the complete graph. Several such problems are explored being a junction point between Ramsey theory, extremal graph theory (Turán type problems), zero-sum Ramsey theory, and interpolation theorems in graph theory. A role-model of these problems is the following: Let $G$ be a graph with $e(G)$ edges. We say that $G$ is omnitonal if there exists a function ${\rm ot}(n,G)$ such that the following holds true for $n$ sufficiently large: For any $2$-coloring $f: E(K_n) \to \{red, blue \}$ such that there are more than ${\rm ot}(n,G)$ edges from each color, and for any pair of non-negative integers $r$ and $b$ with $r+b = e(G)$, there is a copy of $G$ in $K_n$ with exactly $r$ red edges and $b$ blue edges. We give a structural characterization of omnitonal graphs from which we deduce that omnitonal graphs are, in particular, bipartite graphs, and prove further that, for an omnitonal graph $G$, ${\rm ot}(n,G) = \mathcal{O}(n^{2 - \frac{1}{m}})$, where $m = m(G)$ depends only on $G$. We also present a class of graphs for which ${\rm ot}(n,G) = ex(n,G)$, the celebrated Turán numbers. Many more results and problems of similar flavor are presented.

Perhaps the very first elementary exercise one encounters in graph theory is the result that any graph on at least two vertices must have at least two vertices with the same degree. There are various ways in which this result can be non-trivially generalised. For example, one can interpret this result as saying that in any graph $G$ on at least two vertices there is a set $B$ of at least two vertices such that the difference between the largest and the smallest degrees (in $G$) of the vertices of $B$ is zero. In this vein we make the following definition. For any $B\subset V(G)$, let the spread $sp(B)$ of $B$ be defined to be the difference between the largest and the smallest of the degrees of the vertices in $B$. For any $k\geq 0$, let $sp(G,k)$ be the largest cardinality of a set of vertices $B$ such that $sp(B)\leq k$. Therefore the first elementary result in graph theory says that, for any graph $G$ on at least two vertices, $sp(G,0)\geq 2$. In this paper we first give a proof of a result of Erd\" os, Chen, Rousseau and Schelp which generalises the above to $sp(G,k)\geq k+2$ for any graph on at least $k+2$ vertices. Our proof is short and elementary and does not use the famous Erd\" os-Gallai Theorem on vertex degrees. We then develop lower bounds for $sp(G,k)$ in terms of the order of $G$ and its minimum, maximum and average degree. We then use these results to give lower bounds on $sp(G,k)$ for trees and maximal outerplanar graphs, most of which we show to be sharp.

Let ${\mathcal G}$ be an infinite family of connected graphs and let $k$ be a positive integer. We say that $k$ is ${\it forcing}$ for ${\mathcal G}$ if for all $G \in {\mathcal G}$ but finitely many, the following holds. Any $\{-1,1\}$-weighing of the edges of $G$ for which all connected subgraphs on $k$ edges are positively weighted implies that $G$ is positively weighted. Otherwise, we say that it is ${\it weakly~forcing}$ for ${\mathcal G}$ if any such weighing implies that the weight of $G$ is bounded from below by a constant. Otherwise we say that $k$ ${\it collapses}$ for ${\mathcal G}$. We classify $k$ for some of the most prominent classes of graphs, such as all connected graphs, all connected graphs with a given maximum degree and all connected graphs with a given average degree.

The maximum oriented $k$-forcing number of a simple graph $G$, written $\MOF_k(G)$, is the maximum directed $k$-forcing number among all orientations of $G$. This invariant was recently introduced by Caro, Davila and Pepper in [CaroDavilaPepper], and in the current paper we study the special case where $G$ is the complete graph with order $n$, denoted $K_n$. While $\MOF_k(G)$ is an invariant for the underlying simple graph $G$, $\MOF_k(K_n)$ can also be interpreted as an interesting property for tournaments. Our main results further focus on the case when $k=1$. These include a lower bound on $\MOF(K_n)$ of roughly $\frac{3}{4}n$, and for $n\ge 2$, a lower bound of $n - \frac{2n}{\log_2(n)}$. Along the way, we also consider various lower bounds on the maximum oriented $k$-forcing number for the closely related complete $q$-partite graphs.

This article studies the \emph{$k$-forcing number} for oriented graphs, generalizing both the \emph{zero forcing number} for directed graphs and the $k$-forcing number for simple graphs. In particular, given a simple graph $G$, we introduce the maximum (minimum) oriented $k$-forcing number, denoted $\MOF_k(G)$ ($\mof_k(G)$), which is the largest (smallest) $k$-forcing number among all possible orientations of $G$. These new ideas are compared to known graph invariants and it is shown that, among other things, $\mof(G)$ equals the path covering number of $G$ while $\MOF_k(G)$ is greater than or equal to the independence number of $G$ -- with equality holding if $G$ is a tree or if $k$ is at least the maximum degree of $G$. Along the way, we also show that many recent results about $k$-forcing number can be modified for oriented graphs.

We prove the following results solving a problem raised in [Y. Caro, R. Yuster, On zero-sum and almost zero-sum subgraphs over $\mathbb{Z}$, Graphs Combin. 32 (2016), 49--63]. For a positive integer $m\geq 2$, $m\neq 4$, there are infinitely many values of $n$ such that the following holds: There is a weighting function $f:E(K_n)\to \{-1,1\}$ (and hence a weighting function $f: E(K_n)\to \{-1,0,1\}$), such that $\sum_{e\in E(K_n)}f(e)=0$ but, for every copy $H$ of $K_m$ in $K_n$, $\sum_{e\in E(H)}f(e)\neq 0$. On the other hand, for every integer $n\geq 5$ and every weighting function $f:E(K_n)\to \{-1,1\}$ such that $|\sum_{e\in E(K_n)}f(e)|\leq \binom{n}{2}-h(n)$, where $h(n)=2(n+1)$ if $n \equiv 0$ (mod $4$) and $h(n)=2n$ if $n \not\equiv 0$ (mod $4$), there is always a copy $H$ of $K_4$ in $K_n$ for which $\sum_{e\in E(H)}f(e)=0$, and the value of $h(n)$ is sharp.

If $A$ is an independent set of a graph $G$ such that the vertices in $A$ have different degrees, then we call $A$ an irregular independent set of $G$. If $D$ is a dominating set of $G$ such that the vertices that are not in $D$ have different numbers of neighbours in $D$, then we call $D$ an irregular dominating set of $G$. The size of a largest irregular independent set of $G$ and the size of a smallest irregular dominating set of $G$ are denoted by $α_{ir}(G)$ and $γ_{ir}(G)$, respectively. We initiate the investigation of these two graph parameters. For each of them, we obtain sharp bounds in terms of basic graph parameters such as the order, the size, the minimum degree and the maximum degree, and we obtain Nordhaus-Gaddum-type bounds. We also establish sharp bounds relating the two parameters. Furthermore, we characterize the graphs $G$ with $α_{ir}(G)=1$, we determine those that are planar, and we determine those that are outerplanar.

Given a graph $G$, we would like to find (if it exists) the largest induced subgraph $H$ in which there are at least $k$ vertices realizing the maximum degree of $H$. This problem was first posed by Caro and Yuster. They proved, for example, that for every graph $G$ on $n$ vertices we can guarantee, for $k = 2$, such an induced subgraph $H$ by deleting at most $2\sqrt{n}$ vertices, but the question if $2\sqrt{n}$ is best possible remains open. Among the results obtained in this paper we prove that: 1. For every graph $G$ on $n \geq 4$ vertices we can delete at most $\lceil \frac{- 3 + \sqrt{ 8n- 15}}{2 } \rceil$ vertices to get an induced subgraph $H$ with at least two vertices realizing $Δ(H)$, and this bound is sharp, solving the problems left open by Caro and Yuster. 2.For every graph $G$ with maximum degree $Δ\geq 1$ we can delete at most $\lceil \frac{ -3 + \sqrt{8Δ+1}}{2 } \rceil$ vertices to get an induced subgraph $H$ with at least two vertices realizing $Δ(H)$, and this bound is sharp. 3. Every graph $G$ with $Δ(G) \leq 2$ and least $2k - 1$ vertices (respectively $2k - 2$ vertices if k is even) contains an induced subgraph $H$ in which at least $k$ vertices realise $Δ(H)$, and these bound are sharp.

The following result gives the flavor of this paper: Let $t$, $k$ and $q$ be integers such that $q\geq 0$, $0\leq t < k$ and $t \equiv k \,({\rm mod}\, 2)$, and let $s\in [0,t+1]$ be the unique integer satisfying $s \equiv q + \frac{k-t-2}{2} \,({\rm mod} \, (t+2))$. Then for any integer $n$ such that \[n \ge \max\left\{k,\frac{1}{2(t+2)}k^2 + \frac{q-s}{t+2}k - \frac{t}{2} + s\right\}\] and any function $f:[n]\to \{-1,1\}$ with $|\sum_{i=1}^nf(i)| \le q$, there is a set $B \subseteq [n]$ of $k$ consecutive integers with $|\sum_{y\in B}f(y)| \le t$. Moreover, this bound is sharp for all the parameters involved and a characterization of the extremal sequences is given. This and other similar results involving different subsequences are presented, including decompositions of sequences into subsequences of bounded weight.

A perfect forest is a spanning forest of a connected graph $G$, all of whose components are induced subgraphs of $G$ and such that all vertices have odd degree in the forest. A perfect forest generalised a perfect matching since, in a matching, all components are trees on one edge. Scott first proved the Perfect Forest Theorem, namely, that every connected graph of even order has a perfect forest. Gutin then gave another proof using linear algebra. We give here two very short proofs of the Perfect Forest Theorem which use only elementary notions from graph theory. Both our proofs yield polynomial-time algorithms for finding a perfect forest in a connected graph of even order.

We prove the following result: If $G$ be a connected graph on $n \ge 6$ vertices, then there exists a set of vertices $D$ with $|D| \le \frac{n}{3}$ and such that $V(G) \setminus N[D]$ is an independent set, where $N[D]$ is the closed neighborhood of $D$. Furthermore, the bound is sharp. This seems to be the first result in the direction of partial domination with constrained structure on the graph induced by the non-dominated vertices, which we further elaborate in this paper.

We look at colourings of $r$-uniform hypergraphs, focusing our attention on unique colourability and gaps in the chromatic spectrum. The pattern of an edge $E$ in an $r$-uniform hypergraph $H$ whose vertices are coloured is the partition of $r$ induced by the colour classes of the vertices in $E$. Let $Q$ be a set of partitions of $r$. A $Q$-colouring of $H$ is a colouring of its vertices such that only patterns appearing in $Q$ are allowed. We first show that many known hypergraph colouring problems, including Ramsey theory, can be stated in the language of $Q$-colourings. Then, using as our main tools the notions of $Q$-colourings and $Σ$-hypergraphs, we define and prove a result on tight colourings, which is a strengthening of the notion of unique colourability. $Σ$-hypergraphs are a natural generalisation of $σ$-hypergraphs introduced by the first two authors in an earlier paper. We also show that there exist $Σ$-hypergraphs with arbitrarily large $Q$-chromatic number and chromatic number but with bounded clique number. Dvorak et al. have characterised those $Q$ which can lead to a hypergraph with a gap in its $Q$-spectrum. We give a short direct proof of the necessity of their condition on $Q$. We also prove a partial converse for the special case of $Σ$-hypergraphs. Finally, we show that, for at least one family $Q$ which is known to yield hypergraphs with gaps, there exist no $Σ$-hypergraphs with gaps in their $Q$-spectrum.

A path $v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_m$ in a graph $G$ is $degree$-$monotone$ if $deg(v_1) \leq deg(v_2) \leq \cdots \leq deg(v_m)$ where $deg(v_i)$ is the degree of $v_i$ in $G$. Longest degree-monotone paths have been studied in several recent papers. Here we consider the Ramsey type problem for degree monotone paths. Denote by $M_k(m)$ the minimum number $M$ such that for all $n \geq M$, in any $k$-edge coloring of $K_n$ there is some $1\leq j \leq k$ such that the graph formed by the edges colored $j$ has a degree-monotone path of order $m$. We prove several nontrivial upper and lower bounds for $M_k(m)$.

A degree monotone path in a graph $G$ is a path $P$ such that the sequence of degrees of the vertices in the order in which they appear on $P$ is monotonic. The length of the longest degree monotone path in $G$ is denoted by $mp(G)$. This parameter, inspired by the well-known Erdos-Szekeres theorem, has been studied by the authors in two earlier papers. Here we consider a saturation problem for the parameter $mp(G)$. We call $G$ saturated if, for every edge $e$ added to $G$, $mp(G+e) >mp(G)$, and we define $h(n,k)$ to be the least possible number of edges in a saturated graph $G$ on $n$ vertices with $mp(G) < k$, while $mp(G+e) \geq k$ for every new edge $e$. We obtain linear lower and upper bounds for $h(n,k)$, we determine exactly the values of $h(n,k)$ for $k=3$ and $4$, and we present constructions of saturated graphs.

A path $P$ in a graph $G$ is said to be a degree monotone path if the sequence of degrees of the vertices of $P$ in the order in which they appear on $P$ is monotonic. The length of the longest degree monotone path in $G$ is denoted by $mp(G)$. This parameter was first studied in an earlier paper by the authors where bounds in terms of other parameters of $G$ were obtained. In this paper we concentrate on the study of how $mp(G)$ changes under various operations on $G$. We first consider how $mp(G)$ changes when an edge is deleted, added, contracted or subdivided. We similarly consider the effects of adding or deleting a vertex. We sometimes restrict our attention to particular classes of graphs. Finally we study $mp(G \times H)$ in terms of $mp(G)$ and $mp(H)$ where $\times$ is either the Cartesian product or the join of two graphs. In all these cases we give bounds on the parameter $mp$ of the modified graph in terms of the original graph or graphs and we show that all the bounds are sharp.